You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Connie Hawkins v. Heck Yea Quarter Horses, LLC

Citation: Not availableDocket: 2016-CA-00215-COA

Court: Court of Appeals of Mississippi; July 25, 2017; Mississippi; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves a wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Connie Hawkins against Heck Yea Quarter Horses LLC and associated parties following the death of her husband, George Hawkins, due to heat stroke. The lawsuit was initially heard in the Hinds County Circuit Court, where Heck Yea moved for summary judgment on the basis that their actions constituted good Samaritan assistance under Mississippi Code Annotated section 73-25-37(1). The court granted summary judgment, ruling that the good Samaritan statute applied, and found no material issue of fact. Hawkins appealed, arguing that general negligence principles should apply as her husband was an invitee on the property. However, the appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, finding that most of Hawkins's evidence was inadmissible hearsay, and that the evidence presented did not demonstrate that Heck Yea's actions were the proximate cause of George's death. The court concluded that Heck Yea had fulfilled its duty of care by providing reasonable assistance, which George declined. Thus, the ruling was affirmed, and no liability was imposed on Heck Yea under either the good Samaritan statute or general negligence principles.

Legal Issues Addressed

Admissibility of Evidence

Application: The court found that Hawkins's evidence was largely inadmissible hearsay, thereby weakening her wrongful-death claim against Heck Yea.

Reasoning: Hawkins claimed that Heck Yea breached their duty of care, asserting that George was an invitee. However, the court found her evidence insufficient, as most supporting affidavits were deemed inadmissible hearsay, except for one from a medical professional suggesting timely intervention could have altered the outcome.

Duty of Care Owed to Invitees

Application: The court acknowledged that as an invitee, George Hawkins was owed a duty of reasonable care, but concluded that this duty was met by Heck Yea.

Reasoning: The court acknowledged that George was an invitee and received reasonable care when he was taken to the barn for shade and offered assistance, which he declined.

Good Samaritan Statute under Mississippi Law

Application: The court determined that Heck Yea Quarter Horses LLC was protected under the good Samaritan statute for their actions in providing emergency care to George Hawkins.

Reasoning: The court granted the summary judgment, finding no material issue of fact, and concluded the good Samaritan statute applied.

Standard for Summary Judgment

Application: The court applied the Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), which permits summary judgment when there is no genuine issue of material fact.

Reasoning: The court affirmed this decision, applying the standard under Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), which allows for summary judgment when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.