Narrative Opinion Summary
Edmond Calloway's application for leave to file original process and his petition for a writ of mandamus and/or extraordinary relief have been dismissed by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, as of May 31, 2017. The court referenced the precedent set in Commonwealth v. Ali, which states that hybrid representation is not permissible. Additionally, the Prothonotary is instructed to forward the filings to the counsel of record.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dismissal of Application for Leave to File Original Processsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court dismissed Edmond Calloway's application for leave to file original process.
Reasoning: Edmond Calloway's application for leave to file original process and his petition for a writ of mandamus and/or extraordinary relief have been dismissed by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, as of May 31, 2017.
Procedural Handling by Prothonotarysubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to the counsel of record, ensuring proper procedural handling of the documents.
Reasoning: Additionally, the Prothonotary is instructed to forward the filings to the counsel of record.
Prohibition of Hybrid Representationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court applied the precedent from Commonwealth v. Ali to deny hybrid representation, which was one of the reasons for dismissing Calloway's filings.
Reasoning: The court referenced the precedent set in Commonwealth v. Ali, which states that hybrid representation is not permissible.