You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

AquAlliance v. United States Bureau of Reclamation

Citations: 856 F.3d 101; 47 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20067; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8174; 2017 WL 1842507Docket: 15-5325

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit; May 9, 2017; Federal Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves AquAlliance, a non-profit organization concerned with environmental impacts in Northern California, which filed a lawsuit against the United States Bureau of Reclamation following denied Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. AquAlliance sought information regarding water wells, which the Bureau withheld citing FOIA Exemption 9. This exemption allows the government to withhold geological and geophysical information about wells, including their locations and depths. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted summary judgment in favor of the Bureau, determining that the information requested by AquAlliance constitutes 'geophysical information' as defined under Exemption 9. The court rejected AquAlliance's argument that the exemption should only apply to oil and gas wells, emphasizing that the statutory language imposes no such limitation. The ruling was affirmed on appeal, with the court reiterating that Exemption 9 encompasses all wells and protects valuable geological data essential for managing water resources, particularly in the Western United States. The court adhered to the clear statutory language, dismissing arguments based on legislative history that contradicted the statute's plain terms.

Legal Issues Addressed

FOIA Exemption 9: Geological and Geophysical Information

Application: The court upheld the application of FOIA Exemption 9 to allow the United States Bureau of Reclamation to withhold information on water wells, including their locations and depths, from AquAlliance.

Reasoning: The court affirmed that Exemption 9 applies as intended, allowing the Bureau to withhold the requested information.

Interpretation of 'Geophysical' in Legal Context

Application: The court interpreted 'geophysical' to cover information about well depth and location, as it relates to the underground structure and is considered geological and geophysical data.

Reasoning: The definition of 'geophysical' relates to the underground structure, encompassing aspects such as topography, plate tectonics, and soil composition, as demonstrated by geological and hydrogeological maps that indicate aquifer locations.

Legislative Intent and Statutory Interpretation

Application: The court rejected AquAlliance's interpretation of Exemption 9, affirming that the statutory language is unambiguous and not limited to oil and gas wells, and does not require a competitive-advantage limitation.

Reasoning: AquAlliance contends that geological and geophysical data should only qualify if it is technical or provides a competitive advantage, but this interpretation is rejected as the term is unambiguous and does not support a competitive-advantage limitation.