You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Shawn Thorp v. State of Florida

Citation: Not availableDocket: 16-2768

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; April 2, 2017; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Shawn Thorp appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County to the District Court of Appeal, First District of Florida. The court issued its opinion on April 3, 2017, affirming the lower court's ruling. The case was presided over by Judge David W. Fina, with representation for the appellant by Public Defender Andy Thomas and Assistant Public Defender Lori A. Willner, and representation for the appellee by Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer J. Moore. The decision was unanimous, with Justices ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY concurring. The ruling is not final until the time for filing a motion for rehearing expires or the disposition of such a motion, if filed.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Rulings

Application: The appellate court affirmed the decision of the lower court, maintaining the original ruling without changes.

Reasoning: The court issued its opinion on April 3, 2017, affirming the lower court's ruling.

Appeal Process and Jurisdiction

Application: The appellant sought review of a decision from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County in the District Court of Appeal, First District of Florida.

Reasoning: Shawn Thorp appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County to the District Court of Appeal, First District of Florida.

Finality of Appellate Decisions

Application: The ruling is not considered final until the period for filing a motion for rehearing expires or such a motion is decided.

Reasoning: The ruling is not final until the time for filing a motion for rehearing expires or the disposition of such a motion, if filed.

Judicial Concurrence in Appellate Decisions

Application: The decision of the appellate court was unanimous, with all participating justices concurring in the judgment.

Reasoning: The decision was unanimous, with Justices ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY concurring.