You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

DeFelice v. Cummings

Citation: Not availableDocket: 476, 2016

Court: Supreme Court of Delaware; March 7, 2017; Delaware; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed the final judgment of the Superior Court in the case of Michael DeFelice v. Bobby Cummings, Sheri Tull, Elmer Harris, Stephen Misetic, and Harold Bozeman. The decision, issued on March 8, 2017, followed a careful review of the parties’ briefs and the appeal record, confirming the validity of the Superior Court's memorandum opinion and order from August 16, 2016. The affirmation indicates that the Supreme Court found no grounds to overturn the lower court's decision.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review of Lower Court Decisions

Application: The Supreme Court of Delaware reviewed and affirmed the Superior Court's decision, indicating that the appellate court found no errors warranting a reversal.

Reasoning: The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed the final judgment of the Superior Court in the case of Michael DeFelice v. Bobby Cummings, Sheri Tull, Elmer Harris, Stephen Misetic, and Harold Bozeman.

Confirmation of Lower Court's Findings

Application: The Supreme Court confirmed the findings and conclusions of the Superior Court as presented in its memorandum opinion and order.

Reasoning: The decision, issued on March 8, 2017, followed a careful review of the parties’ briefs and the appeal record, confirming the validity of the Superior Court's memorandum opinion and order from August 16, 2016.