You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

City of Huntington Woods v. City of Oak Park

Citation: Not availableDocket: 152035

Court: Michigan Supreme Court; February 28, 2017; Michigan; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on March 3, 2017, regarding the case involving the City of Huntington Woods and the City of Pleasant Ridge as plaintiffs/counter-defendants (appellants) against the City of Oak Park as the defendant/counter-plaintiff (appellee), with the 45th District Court also listed as a defendant-appellee. The court acknowledged receipt of a final report from special mediator Chief Judge Michael J. Talbot, indicating that the parties failed to reach a settlement. Consequently, the court mandated that briefing periods under MCR 7.312(E) and (H) will commence from the date of this order. The order was certified as a true and complete copy by Clerk Larry S. Royster.

Legal Issues Addressed

Commencement of Briefing Periods under Michigan Court Rules

Application: The Michigan Supreme Court mandates the initiation of the briefing periods as per the Michigan Court Rules due to the failure of settlement.

Reasoning: Consequently, the court mandated that briefing periods under MCR 7.312(E) and (H) will commence from the date of this order.

Role of Special Mediator in Settlement Process

Application: The special mediator, Chief Judge Michael J. Talbot, submitted a final report indicating the unsuccessful attempt at settlement among the parties involved.

Reasoning: The court acknowledged receipt of a final report from special mediator Chief Judge Michael J. Talbot, indicating that the parties failed to reach a settlement.