You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

In re the Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jeremy Lloyd Brantingham, a Minnesota Attorney Registration No. 0299558.

Citations: 889 N.W.2d 560; 2017 Minn. LEXIS 40Docket: A16-674

Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota; January 24, 2017; Minnesota; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves a Minnesota attorney who was suspended from practicing law for a minimum period of 30 days and sought reinstatement. The attorney had complied with all suspension terms, except for passing the written examination on professional responsibility, which was a prerequisite for reinstatement. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility did not oppose the reinstatement. Consequently, the attorney was conditionally reinstated effective January 21, 2017, subject to passing the required examination. Additionally, the attorney was placed on a two-year disciplinary probation with specific conditions, including compliance with the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, maintaining detailed law office and trust account records, and cooperating fully with the Director's Office. The attorney was required to submit proof of successful examination completion by December 8, 2017, to avoid automatic re-suspension. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to professional standards and the conditions imposed for reinstatement following disciplinary action.

Legal Issues Addressed

Compliance with Professional Conduct Rules

Application: The attorney must adhere to the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct as a condition of reinstatement.

Reasoning: Compliance with the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct is required.

Conditional Reinstatement of Attorney License

Application: The attorney was conditionally reinstated to practice law contingent on passing a professional responsibility examination.

Reasoning: Effective January 21, 2017, Brantingham is conditionally reinstated to practice law, contingent upon his successful completion of the aforementioned examination.

Disciplinary Probation Conditions

Application: The attorney is placed on disciplinary probation for two years with specific conditions to ensure compliance with professional standards.

Reasoning: He is placed on disciplinary probation for two years with specific conditions: [...] He must cooperate fully with the Director's Office, responding promptly to correspondence, providing a current mailing address, and notifying the Director of any address changes.

Failure to Meet Reinstatement Conditions

Application: Failure to submit proof of successful examination completion will result in automatic re-suspension.

Reasoning: Failure to do so will result in automatic re-suspension pending successful completion of the exam, as per the Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

Maintenance of Law Office and Trust Account Records

Application: The attorney is required to maintain detailed financial records and make them available to the Director as a condition of his probation.

Reasoning: He is mandated to maintain law office and trust account records in accordance with relevant professional conduct rules, including maintaining detailed financial records and making them available to the Director as needed.