You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Connie Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge, Richard Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge and Richard Rogge as Administrator of the Estate of Richard Hollas Rogge v. the City of Richmond, Texas

Citation: Not availableDocket: 01-14-00866-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; January 9, 2017; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas at Houston issued an order regarding the motion for rehearing in the case of Connie Rogge and Richard Rogge against the City of Richmond, Texas. The motion, filed on October 14, 2016, by the appellants, was denied. The decision was signed by Judge Michael Massengale and involved a panel consisting of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd, with Justice Keyes dissenting from the denial. The order is dated January 10, 2017.

Legal Issues Addressed

Judicial Panel Decision

Application: The decision was made by a panel of three justices, with one justice dissenting from the denial of the motion for rehearing.

Reasoning: The decision was signed by Judge Michael Massengale and involved a panel consisting of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd, with Justice Keyes dissenting from the denial.

Motion for Rehearing Denial

Application: The appellate court denied the appellants' motion for rehearing filed against the City of Richmond, Texas.

Reasoning: The motion, filed on October 14, 2016, by the appellants, was denied.