Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Loren Brewer v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Schlumberger N v. and Jose Salazar Jr.
Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-16-00519-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; October 6, 2016; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas, addressed the case of Loren Brewer (Appellant) vs. Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Schlumberger, N.V. A/K/A Schlumberger Limited, and Jose Salazar, Jr. (Appellees). The clerk’s record, due on September 9, 2016, was delayed because the appellant did not pay or arrange payment for its preparation. A notification of late record was filed on September 2, 2016, stating the appellant was not entitled to the record without payment. The court ordered the appellant to provide proof of payment or proof of indigency by September 19, 2016, warning that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant did not respond, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on September 28, 2016. On September 30, 2016, the appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal, which the court interpreted as a motion for rehearing, indicating it was opposed by the appellee. The court has since ordered the appellee to file a response to the motion by October 21, 2016. The order was issued by Justice Marialyn Barnard, with the court clerk, Keith E. Hottle, attesting to it on October 6, 2016.