You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

LAUTNER, JOHN E., PEOPLE v

Citation: Not availableDocket: KA 13-01889

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; March 20, 2015; New York; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

John E. Lautner was convicted in Ontario County Court for aggravated driving while intoxicated, driving while intoxicated, and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, following a guilty plea. The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, upheld the conviction in a unanimous decision, affirming the judgment rendered by Judge Frederick G. Reed on March 6, 2013. The appeal was represented by Leanne Lapp of the Public Defender's Office for the defendant and R. Michael Tantillo, District Attorney, for the respondent. The order affirming the judgment was entered on March 20, 2015.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Conviction by Appellate Division

Application: The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York upheld the conviction in a unanimous decision, affirming the lower court's judgment.

Reasoning: The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, upheld the conviction in a unanimous decision, affirming the judgment rendered by Judge Frederick G. Reed on March 6, 2013.

Conviction for Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated

Application: The defendant, John E. Lautner, was convicted of aggravated driving while intoxicated following a guilty plea.

Reasoning: John E. Lautner was convicted in Ontario County Court for aggravated driving while intoxicated, driving while intoxicated, and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, following a guilty plea.

Representation in Criminal Appeal

Application: The appeal was represented by the Public Defender's Office for the defendant and the District Attorney for the respondent.

Reasoning: The appeal was represented by Leanne Lapp of the Public Defender's Office for the defendant and R. Michael Tantillo, District Attorney, for the respondent.