You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

GTECH Corporation v. James Steele

Citation: Not availableDocket: 03-16-00172-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; September 28, 2016; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Oral argument for the appeal case No. 03-16-00172-CV, GTECH Corporation v. James Steele et al., is scheduled for October 26, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. Nina Cortell, representing GTECH Corporation as Appellant, has communicated this information to the Clerk of the Third Court of Appeals, Jeffrey D. Kyle. Cortell's contact details, including her direct phone number and email, are provided, along with her affiliation to Haynes and Boone, LLP. The document includes a certificate of service confirming that a true and correct copy of the letter was served to the counsel of record in accordance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on the same date.

Legal Issues Addressed

Compliance with Service Requirements under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

Application: A certificate of service is used to verify that all parties have received the necessary documents, ensuring adherence to procedural rules.

Reasoning: The document includes a certificate of service confirming that a true and correct copy of the letter was served to the counsel of record in accordance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on the same date.

Notification of Oral Argument Schedule

Application: The case schedule for oral argument is formally communicated to the court and involved parties, ensuring all parties are informed of the proceedings.

Reasoning: Oral argument for the appeal case No. 03-16-00172-CV, GTECH Corporation v. James Steele et al., is scheduled for October 26, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.

Representation and Communication in Appellate Process

Application: The appellant's legal representative must provide detailed contact information to facilitate efficient communication with the court.

Reasoning: Nina Cortell, representing GTECH Corporation as Appellant, has communicated this information to the Clerk of the Third Court of Appeals, Jeffrey D. Kyle.