You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Stanley Davis, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Eunice D.C. Davis v. ESC II, LP D/B/A Emeritus at Vickery Towers, Laila Hirjee, M.D., and Laila Hirjee M.D. P.A.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 05-15-00551-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; July 30, 2015; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the appellant, representing a decedent's estate, sought to appeal two trial court orders dismissing medical liability claims due to noncompliance with Chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The orders were issued on February 18, 2015, but the appellant's notice of appeal was filed on April 28, 2015. The Court of Appeals questioned its jurisdiction over the appeal, as the orders were not final; they reserved the determination of attorney’s fees, thereby preventing finality. The Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code allows interlocutory appeals for specific healthcare liability claims under Section 51.014, which must be filed within 20 days of the judgment. The appellant failed to meet this deadline, submitting the notice 69 days post-judgment. The Court, noting the jurisdictional defect, dismissed the appeal due to the untimely filing, as mandated by TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b). Consequently, each party bore its own costs, and the judgment was finalized on July 30, 2015.

Legal Issues Addressed

Deadline for Filing Interlocutory Appeals

Application: The appellant missed the deadline for filing an interlocutory appeal, which must be filed within 20 days of the judgment, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Reasoning: The orders in question were signed on February 18, 2015, establishing a deadline of March 10, 2015, for filing a notice of interlocutory appeal, which is twenty days post-judgment. The appellant submitted the notice of appeal on April 28, 2015, which was sixty-nine days after the judgment, exceeding the deadline.

Final Judgment Requirement for Appeal

Application: The court determined that the orders were not final for the purpose of appeal because they reserved the issue of attorney’s fees for future determination.

Reasoning: A judgment is considered final if it resolves all claims and parties or clearly states it is final. In this case, although the orders included a Mother Hubbard clause and stated they were final, they reserved the issue of attorney’s fees for future determination, thus preventing a conclusion that the orders were final for appeal purposes.

Interlocutory Appeals in Healthcare Liability Claims

Application: The Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code permits interlocutory appeals for certain orders related to expert reports in healthcare liability claims, specifically under Section 51.014.

Reasoning: The Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code permits interlocutory appeals for certain orders related to expert reports in healthcare liability claims, specifically under Section 51.014.

Jurisdictional Limitations Due to Untimely Appeals

Application: The court dismissed the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction as the notice of appeal was filed beyond the permissible deadline.

Reasoning: Without a timely filed notice of appeal, the Court lacks jurisdiction as per TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b). Consequently, the appeal is dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction, and each party is responsible for its own costs.