You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Xenos Yuen, the Law Offices of Yuen & Associates, P.C. v. Hung Ho and H.L.L.S.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 01-13-00124-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; December 28, 2015; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves an appeal in the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas at Houston, concerning Xenos Yuen and The Law Offices of Yuen Associates, P.C. against Hung Ho and H.L.L.S. The appeal was initially stayed due to Xenos Yuen filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 13, invoking an automatic stay on the proceedings. However, the bankruptcy court later granted relief from this stay on December 1, 2015, allowing the appeal to proceed. The appellate court identified deficiencies in the clerk's record, which did not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, lacking a proper front cover, consecutive page numbering, and a detailed table of contents, and was not text searchable. Consequently, the court ordered the trial court clerk to provide a corrected record within 30 days. The appellate court's order, signed by Judge Russell Lloyd on December 29, 2015, reinstates the appeal process, contingent upon the payment of the filing fee and submission of a proper reporter’s record within the specified timeframe.

Legal Issues Addressed

Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Application: The appeal was initially stayed due to the appellant filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 13, demonstrating the effect of an automatic stay on pending legal proceedings.

Reasoning: The appeal had been stayed due to a notice of bankruptcy filed by appellant Xenos Yuen on January 21, 2013, under Chapter 13.

Compliance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

Application: The clerk’s record was found noncompliant with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, necessitating corrections to meet procedural requirements.

Reasoning: A clerk’s record was received on May 9, 2013, but was found noncompliant with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Relief from Automatic Stay

Application: The bankruptcy court granted relief from the automatic stay, thereby allowing the previously stayed appeal to proceed in the appellate court.

Reasoning: On December 1, 2015, the bankruptcy court granted relief from the automatic stay, allowing the appeal to proceed.

Requirements for Clerk’s Record

Application: The trial court clerk was instructed to submit a corrected clerk’s record, emphasizing procedural compliance in appellate documentation.

Reasoning: The trial court clerk is directed to submit a corrected clerk’s record within 30 days of this order.