Narrative Opinion Summary
In this appellate case, the Appellees, comprising Brian Davidson, operating as Panoramic Investigations, and UBS Financial Services, Inc., filed a joint motion to extend the deadline for submitting their briefs against the Appellants, Jack N. McCrary and Suzanne F. McCrary. The request sought to move the deadline from November 30, 2015, to January 8, 2016, due to the Appellees' counsel's involvement in other legal engagements, including ongoing trials and appeals. The motion was unopposed by the Appellants, as their counsel was duly notified and raised no objections. Legal representatives Steven J. Knight and Paul D. Flack, acting for Panoramic Investigations and UBS Financial Services respectively, ensured procedural compliance by providing a certificate of service, verifying that all relevant parties received the necessary documents on November 23, 2015. The court's decision to grant the extension underscores the importance of thorough and comprehensive legal briefing, reinforcing procedural fairness and diligence in appellate practice.
Legal Issues Addressed
Extension of Filing Deadlines in Appellate Proceduresubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court granted the Appellees' request to extend the deadline for submitting their briefs due to counsel's involvement in other legal matters.
Reasoning: The current deadline for the briefs is November 30, 2015, but the Appellees are requesting an extension until January 8, 2016, citing the need for additional time due to the counsel's involvement in multiple other legal matters, including trials and appeals.
Non-Opposition to Procedural Motionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The motion for extension of time was not opposed by the Appellants, which facilitated its consideration by the court.
Reasoning: All counsel for the Appellants have been notified and have expressed no opposition to the extension.
Procedural Compliance in Filing Motionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The motion complied with procedural requirements, including proper notification to all parties involved, as evidenced by the certificate of service.
Reasoning: The document includes a certificate of service confirming that copies were sent to all relevant parties on November 23, 2015.