Narrative Opinion Summary
A petition for review has been filed in the case of Joel D. Mallory v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA, and Codilis Stawiarski LLC, under case number 15-0494. The respondent is afforded the option to file a response or a waiver of response. Should a waiver be filed, the Court will not consider the petition without first requesting a response from the respondent. No fee is associated with either filing a response or a waiver. The notice is issued by Mr. Christopher Prine, Clerk of the First Court of Appeals, located in Houston, Texas.
Legal Issues Addressed
Court's Discretion in Petition Considerationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Court retains discretion not to consider the petition unless a response is requested following the filing of a waiver by the respondent.
Reasoning: Should a waiver be filed, the Court will not consider the petition without first requesting a response from the respondent.
No Fees for Filing Responses or Waiverssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: There are no financial obligations imposed on the respondent when filing a response or waiver in the context of a petition for review.
Reasoning: No fee is associated with either filing a response or a waiver.
Procedural Requirements for Petition for Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The respondent in a petition for review case has the option to file a response or a waiver of response. The court's consideration of the petition depends on the procedural compliance of the respondent.
Reasoning: The respondent is afforded the option to file a response or a waiver of response.