Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
in the Matter of the Marriage of Amanda Bradshaw and Barney Bradshaw
Citation: Not availableDocket: 06-15-00038-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; August 13, 2015; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
Barney Samuel Bradshaw, the Respondent/Appellee in the case of Amanda Cheri Bradshaw vs. Barney Samuel Bradshaw, has filed a motion to suspend Rule 9.3(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure due to his current incarceration at the Mark W. Michael Unit in Tennessee Colony, Texas. Rule 9.3(a) requires parties to submit specified numbers of document copies for various proceedings. Bradshaw asserts that his incarceration prevents him from duplicating documents as he lacks access to a copy machine. He requests permission to file only the original of all documents instead of the required copies. The motion is respectfully submitted by Bradshaw, who certifies that a copy has been mailed to the attorney for the Appellant.