You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Ramiro R. Mata v. State

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-04-00917-CR

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; July 17, 2015; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Ramiro Mata, the applicant and an incarcerated individual, submits a motion for discovery to the Texas Fourth Court of Appeals, seeking access to essential legal documents to effectively challenge his conviction from the 379th Judicial District Court. He asserts his indigence and inability to pay for record fees, citing Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145. The requested items include: 1. A copy of the indictment. 2. A copy of the judgment and sentence. 3. A copy of the opinion dated November 23, 2005, or the complete records from the court clerk and/or court reporter, referring to a specific case citation (248 SW3d 272). Mata also inquires about any complaints against the prosecutor in his case. He requests the court to grant this motion and any additional relief he may be entitled to. The motion is signed under penalty of perjury, affirming its truthfulness.

Legal Issues Addressed

Access to Legal Documents for Incarcerated Individuals

Application: The applicant, Ramiro Mata, seeks access to essential legal documents to challenge his conviction, underscoring the right of incarcerated individuals to obtain court records.

Reasoning: Ramiro Mata, the applicant and an incarcerated individual, submits a motion for discovery to the Texas Fourth Court of Appeals, seeking access to essential legal documents to effectively challenge his conviction from the 379th Judicial District Court.

Affidavit Signed Under Penalty of Perjury

Application: The motion is verified by Mata's signature under penalty of perjury, affirming the truthfulness of his claims and requests in accordance with legal requirements.

Reasoning: The motion is signed under penalty of perjury, affirming its truthfulness.

Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct

Application: Mata's inquiry about complaints against the prosecutor indicates a procedural step to investigate potential misconduct that may have affected the fairness of his trial.

Reasoning: Mata also inquires about any complaints against the prosecutor in his case.

Indigence and Waiver of Record Fees

Application: Mata claims indigence under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 to waive the fees associated with obtaining the court records necessary for his appeal.

Reasoning: He asserts his indigence and inability to pay for record fees, citing Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145.

Motion for Discovery in Criminal Appeals

Application: The motion for discovery includes specific requests for key documents, highlighting the procedural right to access records that are crucial for an appeal.

Reasoning: The requested items include: 1. A copy of the indictment. 2. A copy of the judgment and sentence. 3. A copy of the opinion dated November 23, 2005, or the complete records from the court clerk and/or court reporter, referring to a specific case citation (248 SW3d 272).