You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Digman, Robert Emmanuel

Citation: Not availableDocket: WR-83,768-01

Court: Texas Supreme Court; September 11, 2015; Texas; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The document appears to be a court record from the Court of Criminal Appeals, dated September 11, 2015. It references case number 8'3 'llO g -Ol T R. w. J..t-r202. Key points include: - The nature of the case involves an appeal, as indicated by its designation within the Court of Criminal Appeals. - The document includes procedural identifiers such as case numbers and possibly names of involved parties, although these are not fully clear due to formatting issues. - There may be references to specific legal actions or decisions made by the lower court, but the text does not provide sufficient clarity on the nature of these decisions. Overall, the document serves as a formal entry or acknowledgment of an appeal in a criminal case, but lacks detailed information on the underlying legal issues or outcomes.

Legal Issues Addressed

Acknowledgment of Appeal

Application: The document serves as an acknowledgment of an appeal in a criminal case within the judicial system.

Reasoning: Overall, the document serves as a formal entry or acknowledgment of an appeal in a criminal case, but lacks detailed information on the underlying legal issues or outcomes.

Appeal in Criminal Cases

Application: The case involves an appeal that is being addressed by the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Reasoning: The nature of the case involves an appeal, as indicated by its designation within the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Court Records and Case Identification

Application: The document is part of a formal court record, including procedural identifiers such as case numbers.

Reasoning: The document includes procedural identifiers such as case numbers and possibly names of involved parties, although these are not fully clear due to formatting issues.