Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Boston Scientific Corporation v. Martha Salazar and Felix Salazar
Citation: Not availableDocket: 05-14-01617-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; July 24, 2015; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
Martha Salazar and Felix Salazar, the Appellees, filed a Second Unopposed Motion for a 60-day extension to submit their brief in the appeal against Boston Scientific Corporation, Inc., the Appellant. This appeal follows a judgment from the 95th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, dated October 2, 2014. The Appellees previously received extensions to file their brief, with the current deadline set for July 31, 2015. The requested extension aims to allow time for finalizing a settlement between the parties, as a Master Settlement Agreement has been executed and a Qualified Settlement Fund established. Counsel for both parties have agreed on the necessity of this timeframe to complete the settlement process. If the 60-day extension is not granted, the Appellees alternatively request a 30-day extension. If granted, the new deadline for the Appellees' brief would be September 29, 2015. Tim K. Goss, along with co-counsel Richard A. Capshaw, David P. Matthews, and Kevin L. Edwards, are submitting a legal document. Contact information for each attorney is provided, including their Texas Bar numbers, email addresses, and office addresses in Dallas and Houston. A Certificate of Service indicates that the document was electronically filed and served on July 24, 2015, to all counsel of record for the Appellees, specifically naming S. Vance Wittie and Maria Katina Karos of Sedgwick, LLP, along with their contact details. Additionally, a Certificate of Conference notes that on July 23, 2015, counsel for both Appellant and Appellees conferred regarding the motion, with Appellant's counsel indicating no opposition to the requested relief. The document is certified by Tim K. Goss on July 24, 2015.