Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Schlittler, David
Citation: Not availableDocket: PD-1505-14
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; May 26, 2015; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
David Schlittler, the Appellant, seeks permission to file an Appellant's Post-Argument Brief following oral arguments heard by the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas on May 20, 2015. Schlittler argues that additional clarification is needed regarding questions posed by the Court during the oral arguments, particularly concerning the implications of a fundamental right, the nature of the challenge to the statute (applied vs. facial), and the class definition under Article 62.001(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The brief will not reiterate previously made arguments but will focus on clarifying these specific issues within a limit of 10 pages. Schlittler anticipates completing this research and filing the brief by May 29, 2015. He emphasizes that the request is made for thoroughness rather than delay. The motion is supported by a certificate of conference indicating that the State's attorney, Melinda Fletcher, does not oppose the motion, and a certificate of compliance confirming adherence to appellate procedure rules regarding document formatting and word count. Additionally, a certificate of service confirms that copies of the motion were sent to the relevant parties in accordance with procedural requirements.