You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Melden & Hunt, Inc. v. East Rio Hondo Water Supply

Citation: Not availableDocket: 13-15-00227-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; December 16, 2015; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals has affirmed the judgment of the trial court in the case Melden. Hunt, Inc. v. East Rio Hondo Water Supply, originating from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas (Trial Cause No. 2015-DCL-00497-C). The appellate court ruled that the trial court's decision stands, with costs of the appeal assigned to the appellant. The court's decision is to be certified for enforcement. The judgment was issued on December 17, 2015.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Trial Court Judgment

Application: The Thirteenth Court of Appeals upheld the decision made by the trial court, indicating that the lower court's ruling was correct and should remain in effect.

Reasoning: The Thirteenth Court of Appeals has affirmed the judgment of the trial court in the case Melden. Hunt, Inc. v. East Rio Hondo Water Supply, originating from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas (Trial Cause No. 2015-DCL-00497-C).

Certification for Enforcement of Judgment

Application: The court's decision has been certified for enforcement, meaning the judgment is recognized as final and executable.

Reasoning: The court's decision is to be certified for enforcement.

Cost Allocation on Appeal

Application: The appellate court determined that the costs associated with the appeal should be borne by the appellant, signifying that the appellant is responsible for these expenses as a result of the appeal's outcome.

Reasoning: The appellate court ruled that the trial court's decision stands, with costs of the appeal assigned to the appellant.