Weinberg v. Dickson-Weinberg

Citation: Not availableDocket: SCWC-15-0000362

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court; September 14, 2016; Hawaii; State Supreme Court

Original Court Document: View Document

SummaryOriginalCytator Case TreatmentBackward CitatorAnalysis

EnglishEspañolSimplified EnglishEspañol Fácil

The document outlines various resources and services provided by the judiciary, including contact information, court forms, and procedures for public engagement. Key sections include:

- **Judicial Opinions and Orders**: Access to opinions and orders from the Hawaii Appellate Court, with options to view different formats (HTML, PDF).
- **Court Services**: Information on paying fines, filing court forms, and accessing legal resources, including bilingual services and child custody evaluators.
- **Judicial Transparency**: Availability of judicial performance reviews and financial disclosure statements.
- **Access to Justice**: Initiatives and resources aimed at improving access to legal assistance, including accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
- **Community Engagement**: Programs for civic education and volunteer opportunities, as well as outreach efforts such as court tours and educational seminars.

Overall, the document serves as a comprehensive guide for litigants, attorneys, and the public to navigate the judicial system and access necessary legal services.

On September 14, 2016, various legal orders were issued by the Supreme Court of Hawaii and the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) concerning multiple cases. Key cases include:

1. **Weinberg v. Dickson-Weinberg**: The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner’s response to a ruling and the application for a writ of certiorari, following a prior ICA memorandum opinion.
2. **Valencia v. Valencia**: The ICA dismissed the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction, rendering all pending motions moot.
3. **Hammer v. Hammer**: The ICA approved, with prejudice, a stipulation to dismiss the appeal.
4. **Cornelio v. State** and **Villanueva v. State**: Both cases were affirmed by the ICA.
5. **State v. Bristow**: The Supreme Court rejected the application for a writ of certiorari related to this case.
6. **Middleton v. State**: The ICA dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and subsequent motions for reconsideration were denied.
7. **In re TH**: Affirmed by the ICA and consolidated with another case.
8. **State v. Tran**: An order of correction was issued by the ICA.
9. **Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith**: A public reprimand was ordered.
10. **Gustafson Real Estate LLC v. Watkins**: The ICA dismissed a motion for reconsideration.
11. **Erum v. County of Kauai**: Affirmed by the ICA.
12. **State v. Scalera**: The Supreme Court accepted the application for a writ of certiorari.
13. **Ke Kailani Partners, LLC v. Ke Kailani Development LLC**: The Supreme Court rejected an application for a writ of certiorari.
14. **Bosworth v. Foss Maritime Company**: The Supreme Court accepted the application for a writ of certiorari, vacated the ICA's dismissal order, and remanded the case.

Each entry includes case identifiers, court levels, and procedural outcomes, reflecting a range of dismissals, affirmations, and rejections across various legal issues.

A series of legal actions and decisions were recorded, detailing various applications for Writs of Certiorari and motions for reconsideration across multiple cases and courts, primarily in 2016. Significant entries include:

1. **Le v. WM**: An application for Writ of Certiorari was filed on June 19, 2016, leading to an amended order dismissing the application by the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board on September 2, 2016.

2. **Umberger v. Department of Land and Natural Resources**: Several motions and orders were processed, including an order of correction filed on September 1, 2016.

3. **State v. Ui**: An application for Writ of Certiorari was accepted by the Supreme Court, with significant orders issued on September 1, 2016.

4. **State v. McKinley**: Multiple applications and orders of correction were noted, culminating in a decision on September 1, 2016.

5. **Cox v. Cox**: The case involved motions for reconsideration, with orders dismissing the initial application for Writ of Certiorari filed on February 27, 2015. Subsequent applications and motions were also addressed, with various opinions filed, including dissenting opinions.

6. **State v. Macaso** and other cases, such as **Pickett v. Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.** and **Bantolina v. Bantolina**, had their opinions vacated, affirmed, or remanded by the ICA throughout August 31, 2016.

Overall, the document highlights a complex interplay of legal proceedings with a focus on motions, applications for writs, orders of correction, and diverse outcomes across multiple cases within the judicial system.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Scott v. Cardoza was denied on August 30, 2016, following its submission on August 18, 2016. In Pouono v. Daiichiya-Loves Bakery, Inc., a stipulation for dismissal was approved on February 26, 2015, and the application for Writ of Certiorari was accepted on July 30, 2015. In State v. Kim, multiple applications for Writ of Certiorari were filed, with the last dismissal occurring on June 23, 2016. The decision in Bitterman v. State was affirmed on August 26, 2016. Similarly, in State v. Goebel, the application for Writ of Certiorari was rejected, and multiple cases, including In re TA, KA, AS and State v. Mattos, were affirmed by the court on August 26, 2016. Goran Pleho, LLC v. Lacy involved a denied motion for partial reconsideration and an amended memorandum opinion filed on August 26, 2016. Several other affirmed cases include State v. Diego and HSBC Bank USA v. Collman on August 24, 2016, while State v. Brown was vacated and remanded on the same date. Additional orders included rejecting the Writ of Certiorari in State v. Satano and approving a stipulation for dismissal in Zephyr Insurance Company v. Insurance Commissioner on August 23, 2016. The County of Kauai v. Hanalei River Holdings Limited and State v. Ichimura both saw their Writ of Certiorari applications accepted on August 18, 2016.

Access to traffic and criminal cases in Hawaii is provided through district court criminal and appellate cases. The Hawaii Judiciary disclaims affiliation with Sustain Technologies, Inc. and its registered trademark, eCourt. Ho`ohiki offers access to criminal and civil case information in the Circuit and Family courts, along with select civil cases in District Courts. The document includes various resources for job seekers at the Judiciary, e-filing of case information, and status updates via social media platforms. Language access services are available in multiple languages including Cantonese, Chuukese, Ilokano, Japanese, Korean, Mandarin, Marshallese, Pohnpeian, Samoan, Spanish, Tagalog, Tongan, and Vietnamese.

Additional resources include information on paying fines, court forms, bar examination results, divorce law seminars, and volunteer opportunities. The document outlines judicial performance reviews, financial disclosure statements for litigants, and offers access to legal resources, bilingual attorneys, jury instructions, and continuing legal education. Services such as ADA accommodations and language assistance are also highlighted, alongside outreach initiatives and community engagement programs.

Judicial administrative details, including contact information for various courts and offices, are provided, along with a survey soliciting public opinions. The document concludes with a disclaimer regarding privacy policy, terms of use, and accessibility information.