Narrative Opinion Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order on September 9, 2016, involving the Attorney Grievance Commission as the plaintiff against the Attorney Discipline Board as the defendant (case number SC: 153046, ADB: 15-000082-GA). The Chief Justice considered a stipulation for the dismissal of the complaint related to superintending control. The court granted the dismissal of the complaint without prejudice, meaning the case can be refiled in the future, and imposed no costs on either party. The Clerk of the Court, Larry S. Royster, certified the order as a true and complete copy.
Legal Issues Addressed
Certification of Court Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Clerk of the Court certified the order as a true and complete copy, ensuring the authenticity and accuracy of the court's decision.
Reasoning: The Clerk of the Court, Larry S. Royster, certified the order as a true and complete copy.
Dismissal of Complaint Without Prejudicesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Michigan Supreme Court granted the dismissal of a complaint related to superintending control, allowing the case to be refiled in the future.
Reasoning: The court granted the dismissal of the complaint without prejudice, meaning the case can be refiled in the future, and imposed no costs on either party.
Superintending Control in Judicial Proceedingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case involved a stipulation concerning superintending control, which was considered by the Chief Justice in the decision-making process.
Reasoning: The Chief Justice considered a stipulation for the dismissal of the complaint related to superintending control.