You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Francois Stapleton v. Mark Butler, Commissioner of Labor

Citation: Not availableDocket: A16A1439

Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia; September 9, 2016; Georgia; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia issued an order on August 30, 2016, regarding case A16A1439, Stapleton v. Butler et al. Francois D. Stapleton's application for discretionary appeal was granted to review a superior court order that upheld the Department of Labor Board of Review's denial of her unemployment benefits. Upon reviewing the record, relevant case law, and statutory provisions, the court concluded that the application was improvidently granted. Consequently, the order granting the application was vacated, and the appeal was dismissed. The document is certified as a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals.

Legal Issues Addressed

Discretionary Appeal in Unemployment Benefits Denial

Application: The Court of Appeals reviewed but ultimately dismissed the discretionary appeal concerning the denial of unemployment benefits by the Department of Labor Board of Review.

Reasoning: Francois D. Stapleton's application for discretionary appeal was granted to review a superior court order that upheld the Department of Labor Board of Review's denial of her unemployment benefits.

Improvident Grant of Discretionary Appeal

Application: After examining the record and applicable law, the court found that the appeal should not have been granted.

Reasoning: Upon reviewing the record, relevant case law, and statutory provisions, the court concluded that the application was improvidently granted.

Vacatur of Appeal Grant and Dismissal of Appeal

Application: The court vacated the order granting the discretionary appeal and dismissed the appeal entirely.

Reasoning: Consequently, the order granting the application was vacated, and the appeal was dismissed.