You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

in Re Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Ryder Integrated Logistics of Texas, LLC

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-16-00507-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; August 8, 2016; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Relators Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Ryder Integrated Logistics of Texas, LLC filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and an emergency motion to stay on August 8, 2016. The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio evaluated the petition and determined that the Relators were not entitled to the requested relief. Consequently, both the petition and the emergency motion were denied, as indicated by the court's order. The court's detailed opinion on the matter is anticipated to be issued at a later date. This proceeding is related to Cause No. 2010-CI-03779, involving Denise Molina and George Duzane as co-conservators of Rafael "Ralph" Molina against the Relators and several other defendants, with the case being presided over by Judge Michael E. Mery in the 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas. The order was officially executed by Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion and the court clerk Keith E. Hottle.

Legal Issues Addressed

Emergency Motion to Stay

Application: The court denied the emergency motion to stay filed by the Relators after reviewing their petition.

Reasoning: Consequently, both the petition and the emergency motion were denied, as indicated by the court's order.

Judicial Procedure in Appeals

Application: The court indicated that a detailed opinion explaining the decision would be issued at a later date, following the denial of the petition and motion.

Reasoning: The court's detailed opinion on the matter is anticipated to be issued at a later date.

Writ of Mandamus

Application: The court evaluated the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by the Relators and determined that they were not entitled to the relief requested.

Reasoning: The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio evaluated the petition and determined that the Relators were not entitled to the requested relief.