Narrative Opinion Summary
The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by relators Jose E. Robles and State Coach Cartage and Distribution, LP on February 24, 2010. After reviewing the petition, along with the response and reply briefs, the court concluded that the relators were not entitled to the relief they sought. The decision was finalized and documented in a memorandum opinion delivered by Chief Justice Catherine Stone and Justices Karen Angelini and Steven C. Hilbig on April 21, 2010, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a).
Legal Issues Addressed
Denial of Writ of Mandamussubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined that the relators, Jose E. Robles and State Coach Cartage and Distribution, LP, were not entitled to the relief they sought through a writ of mandamus.
Reasoning: The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by relators Jose E. Robles and State Coach Cartage and Distribution, LP on February 24, 2010.
Finalization of Court Decisionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision was finalized and documented in a memorandum opinion delivered by the panel of justices, highlighting the procedural adherence to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a).
Reasoning: The decision was finalized and documented in a memorandum opinion delivered by Chief Justice Catherine Stone and Justices Karen Angelini and Steven C. Hilbig on April 21, 2010, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a).
Review Process for Mandamus Petitionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court's decision was based on a thorough review of the petition, along with the response and reply briefs, indicating a comprehensive evaluation process in accordance with procedural rules.
Reasoning: After reviewing the petition, along with the response and reply briefs, the court concluded that the relators were not entitled to the relief they sought.