Narrative Opinion Summary
The Court of Appeals for the Second District of Texas addressed Moncrief Oil International, Inc.'s motion to dismiss its appeal against OAO Gazprombank. The court granted the motion, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without prejudice concerning OAO Gazprombank. The case will now be styled as "Moncrief Oil International, Inc. v. OAO Gazprom, Gazprom Export, LLC, and Gazprom Marketing Trading, Ltd." The appellant, Moncrief Oil, is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal related to OAO Gazprombank. The decision was delivered by the panel consisting of Justices Walker and Gardner, along with Senior Justice Brigham, sitting by assignment, on April 8, 2010.
Legal Issues Addressed
Allocation of Costs on Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellant, Moncrief Oil, was ordered to bear the costs associated with the appeal concerning OAO Gazprombank, following the dismissal.
Reasoning: The appellant, Moncrief Oil, is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal related to OAO Gazprombank.
Dismissal of Appeal Without Prejudicesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court granted the motion to dismiss the appeal against OAO Gazprombank without prejudice, allowing potential future litigation on the same matter.
Reasoning: The court granted the motion, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without prejudice concerning OAO Gazprombank.
Judicial Panel Compositionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision was made by a judicial panel comprising two sitting justices and one senior justice assigned to the case.
Reasoning: The decision was delivered by the panel consisting of Justices Walker and Gardner, along with Senior Justice Brigham, sitting by assignment, on April 8, 2010.
Re-styling of Case Titlesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Upon dismissal of the appeal against OAO Gazprombank, the case title was modified to reflect the remaining parties involved in the litigation.
Reasoning: The case will now be styled as 'Moncrief Oil International, Inc. v. OAO Gazprom, Gazprom Export, LLC, and Gazprom Marketing Trading, Ltd.'