Narrative Opinion Summary
Petitioner Baron C. Clark filed a writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency stay on December 27, 2010. The court reviewed the petition and determined that Clark was not entitled to the requested relief. Consequently, both the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency stay were denied. This case is related to Cause No. 2010-CI-11759, which involves Clark against the San Antonio Water System, overseen by Judge Sol Casseb, III of the 288th Judicial District Court, though the contested ruling was issued by Judge Michael Peden of the 285th Judicial District Court. The decision was delivered on January 5, 2011.
Legal Issues Addressed
Jurisdiction and Judicial Oversightsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case involves jurisdictional oversight by two different judges from separate Judicial District Courts, with the contested ruling originating from a judge not directly presiding over the related cause number.
Reasoning: This case is related to Cause No. 2010-CI-11759, which involves Clark against the San Antonio Water System, overseen by Judge Sol Casseb, III of the 288th Judicial District Court, though the contested ruling was issued by Judge Michael Peden of the 285th Judicial District Court.
Motion for Emergency Staysubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court denied the petitioner's motion for an emergency stay as part of its ruling on the case.
Reasoning: Consequently, both the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency stay were denied.
Writ of Mandamussubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined that the petitioner was not entitled to the relief sought through a writ of mandamus, leading to its denial.
Reasoning: The court reviewed the petition and determined that Clark was not entitled to the requested relief.