Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Richard Steven Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins and Michael Easton v. Carolyn James
Citation: Not availableDocket: 01-12-00036-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; February 1, 2012; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
An unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of the appeal has been filed by Richard Steven Calkins, both individually and as agent-in-fact for Mary Olive Calkins and Michael Easton, against Carolyn James. The Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, in its memorandum opinion dated February 2, 2012, granted the motion in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), which allows for such dismissals upon the appellant's request. No opinion had been issued prior to the dismissal. Consequently, all other pending motions were deemed moot. The court instructed the clerk to issue the mandate within ten days of the opinion. The panel comprised Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.