You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Coronel, Israel v. State

Citation: Not availableDocket: 05-12-00493-CR

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; November 28, 2012; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Court of Appeals for the 5th District of Texas reinstated the appeal of Israel Coronel against the State of Texas. Following an order on October 23, 2012, requiring the trial court to provide findings regarding the non-filing of the appellant's brief, the Court received a motion from Coronel on November 27, 2012, to lift the abatement order and extend the time to file his brief. The appellant submitted his brief along with this motion. In light of these developments, the Court vacated its October 23 order and granted the motion, officially filing the appellant's brief as of the date of the current order. Justice David L. Bridges presided over this decision.

Legal Issues Addressed

Procedural Orders for Filing Briefs

Application: The Court required the trial court to provide findings regarding the non-filing of the appellant's brief, demonstrating the importance of compliance with procedural requirements in appellate cases.

Reasoning: Following an order on October 23, 2012, requiring the trial court to provide findings regarding the non-filing of the appellant's brief, the Court received a motion from Coronel on November 27, 2012, to lift the abatement order and extend the time to file his brief.

Reinstatement of Appeal

Application: The Court of Appeals for the 5th District of Texas reinstated the appeal of Israel Coronel after addressing procedural issues related to the filing of the appellant's brief.

Reasoning: The Court of Appeals for the 5th District of Texas reinstated the appeal of Israel Coronel against the State of Texas.

Vacating Abatement Orders

Application: The Court vacated its previous order and granted the appellant's motion to lift the abatement, facilitating the continuation of the appeal process upon filing the appellant's brief.

Reasoning: In light of these developments, the Court vacated its October 23 order and granted the motion, officially filing the appellant's brief as of the date of the current order.