You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

W.H. Sutton, Arctic Royalty Limited Partnership, Julie S. Mueller, Janet Lee Smith as Trustee of the Janet Lee Smith Family Trust, Anita Louise Davies as Trustee of the Anita Louise Davies Family Trust and Frederick Jackson Bell Jr. v. SM Energy Company

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-12-00772-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; May 3, 2013; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Appellants W.H. Sutton, Arctic Royalty Limited Partnership, Julie S. Mueller, Janet Lee Smith (Trustee of the Janet Lee Smith Family Trust), Anita Louise Davies (Trustee of the Anita Louise Davies Family Trust), and Frederick Jackson Bell Jr. filed an appeal against SM Energy Company in the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas. The trial originated from the 341st Judicial District Court in Webb County, Texas, under Judge Elma T. Salinas Ender. The court granted the appellants' eighth motion for an extension to file their brief, now due by May 3, 2013. This extension grants a total of 111 days from the original deadline. The court cautioned that no further extensions would be permitted unless accompanied by written proof of extraordinary circumstances. The order was issued by Justice Marialyn Barnard and documented by Clerk of Court Keith E. Hottle on May 3, 2013.

Legal Issues Addressed

Extension of Time for Filing Briefs

Application: The court granted an extension of 111 days for the appellants to file their brief, setting a new deadline of May 3, 2013.

Reasoning: The court granted the appellants' eighth motion for an extension to file their brief, now due by May 3, 2013.

Limitations on Granting Extensions

Application: The court indicated that no further extensions would be allowed unless the appellants provided written proof of extraordinary circumstances.

Reasoning: The court cautioned that no further extensions would be permitted unless accompanied by written proof of extraordinary circumstances.