You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Peter Marshall and Broadway 5 Homes, Inc. v. C-6 Disposal Systems Inc.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-13-00536-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; December 18, 2013; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas, issued an order on December 19, 2013, regarding case number 04-13-00536-CV, involving appellants Peter Marshall and Broadway 5 Homes, Inc. against appellee C-6 Disposal Systems Inc. The court noted that the clerk's record was filed on November 7, 2013, and that the appellants' brief was due by December 9, 2013. As neither the brief nor a motion for extension was filed, the court ordered the appellants to show cause in writing within ten days why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, referencing Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a). The order was issued by Justice Rebeca C. Martinez and recorded by Clerk of Court Keith E. Hottle.

Legal Issues Addressed

Dismissal for Want of Prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)

Application: The court applied this rule by ordering the appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed after they failed to file their brief by the deadline.

Reasoning: The court ordered the appellants to show cause in writing within ten days why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, referencing Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a).

Filing Deadlines for Appellants' Briefs

Application: The court highlighted the importance of adhering to filing deadlines by noting the appellants' failure to submit their brief by the specified date, thus prompting the show cause order.

Reasoning: The court noted that the clerk's record was filed on November 7, 2013, and that the appellants' brief was due by December 9, 2013. As neither the brief nor a motion for extension was filed, the court ordered the appellants to show cause.