You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Ramiro Chavira v. Delores Chavira

Citation: Not availableDocket: 07-11-00018-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; March 22, 2011; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the case of Ramiro Chavira, Sr. v. Delores Chavira, the Texas Court of Appeals for the Seventh District addressed an appeal filed by Chavira, an inmate representing himself. He appealed from the 242nd District Court of Hale County, Texas, under cause number B37423-1008. The court noted that Chavira had not paid the required filing fee of $175, despite being notified multiple times of this requirement and the consequences of noncompliance. The Clerk of the Court initially informed Chavira on January 24, 2011, and provided a deadline to pay the fee. After failing to pay by the extended deadline of March 9, 2011, the court determined that it was authorized to dismiss the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and all pending motions regarding the extension of time for the district clerk to file records were denied as moot.

Legal Issues Addressed

Authority to Dismiss Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c)

Application: The court exercised its authority to dismiss the appeal due to the appellant's noncompliance with procedural requirements related to the filing fee.

Reasoning: After failing to pay by the extended deadline of March 9, 2011, the court determined that it was authorized to dismiss the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c).

Dismissal of Appeal for Nonpayment of Filing Fee

Application: The court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to pay the required filing fee, despite multiple notifications and extensions.

Reasoning: The court noted that Chavira had not paid the required filing fee of $175, despite being notified multiple times of this requirement and the consequences of noncompliance.

Mootness of Pending Motions

Application: All pending motions related to the extension of time for filing records were denied as moot following the dismissal of the appeal.

Reasoning: Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and all pending motions regarding the extension of time for the district clerk to file records were denied as moot.