Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Oscar Trevino v. State
Citation: Not availableDocket: 02-11-00305-CR
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; January 9, 2013; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
Oscar Trevino pled guilty to three counts of burglary of a habitation and one count of aggravated robbery, with allegations of being a repeat offender. The 213th District Court of Tarrant County sentenced him to twenty years for the aggravated robbery and fifteen years for each burglary count, all sentences to run concurrently. Trevino's court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw, asserting that the appeals were frivolous and meeting the requirements of Anders v. California by providing an evaluation of the records. The court conducted an independent examination of the records to identify any potential grounds for appeal, focusing on jurisdictional defects, the voluntariness of the guilty plea, and errors occurring post-plea. After thorough review, the court concurred with counsel's assessment that the appeals were without merit. Consequently, the court affirmed the trial court’s judgments and granted counsel's motion to withdraw. The judgment was delivered on January 10, 2013, by a per curiam opinion with justices Dauphinot, McCoy, and Meier on the panel.