You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Grady R. Mitchell v. Popat Patel, Individually, A/K/A Paul Patel, Kamu Patel, Individually, Sunil Patel, Individually and D/B/A Super 8 Motel and Anand, Inc.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 07-12-00022-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; March 22, 2012; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Grady R. Mitchell appeals a trial court judgment denying him relief in his lawsuit against Popat Patel and others. The appeal was abated and remanded to the 237th District Court of Lubbock County to address Mitchell's affidavit of indigence, which the appellees contested. The trial court is instructed to hold a hearing to determine Mitchell's desire to pursue the appeal, his indigency status, and his entitlement to a free appellate record. The court must transcribe the hearing, issue findings of fact and conclusions of law, and compile a supplemental clerk’s record, including all orders and evidence presented. These records must be filed with the appellate court by April 23, 2012, with any requests for extensions due by the same date.

Legal Issues Addressed

Deadlines for Filing Supplemental Records

Application: All supplemental records and any requests for extension must be submitted to the appellate court by a specified deadline.

Reasoning: These records must be filed with the appellate court by April 23, 2012, with any requests for extensions due by the same date.

Indigency Determination for Appellate Records

Application: The trial court is required to assess the appellant's indigency status to determine eligibility for a free appellate record.

Reasoning: The trial court is instructed to hold a hearing to determine Mitchell's desire to pursue the appeal, his indigency status, and his entitlement to a free appellate record.

Obligations for Transcribing and Filing Hearing Records

Application: The trial court must create a complete record of the hearing, including a transcript, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any related orders or evidence.

Reasoning: The court must transcribe the hearing, issue findings of fact and conclusions of law, and compile a supplemental clerk’s record, including all orders and evidence presented.

Procedural Requirements for Contesting Indigency

Application: The appellees contested the affidavit of indigence, necessitating a procedural review by the trial court.

Reasoning: The appeal was abated and remanded to the 237th District Court of Lubbock County to address Mitchell's affidavit of indigence, which the appellees contested.