You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

in the Interest of N.M.D, R.I.D., and G.T.D.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-13-00849-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; July 9, 2014; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas, affirmed the order of the trial court in case No. 04-13-00849-CV concerning the interest of children N.M.D., R.I.D., and G.T.D. The appeal was from the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, presided over by Judge Richard E. Price. The court ordered appellant Skye Dicker to pay the costs of the appeal to appellee Diana Dicker. The ruling was signed by Chief Justice Catherine Stone on July 9, 2014. Additionally, Associate Judge James Rausch was involved in modifying child support and denying the motion for a new trial.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Trial Court Order

Application: The appellate court upheld the decision made by the trial court regarding the interests of the children involved in the case.

Reasoning: The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, Texas, affirmed the order of the trial court in case No. 04-13-00849-CV concerning the interest of children N.M.D., R.I.D., and G.T.D.

Allocation of Appeal Costs

Application: The appeals court determined that the appellant, Skye Dicker, was responsible for paying the costs associated with the appeal to the appellee, Diana Dicker.

Reasoning: The court ordered appellant Skye Dicker to pay the costs of the appeal to appellee Diana Dicker.

Denial of Motion for New Trial

Application: The trial court's decision to deny the motion for a new trial was part of the proceedings affirmed by the appellate court.

Reasoning: Additionally, Associate Judge James Rausch was involved in modifying child support and denying the motion for a new trial.

Modification of Child Support

Application: The associate judge was involved in making decisions regarding the modification of child support, which was part of the trial court's proceedings.

Reasoning: Additionally, Associate Judge James Rausch was involved in modifying child support and denying the motion for a new trial.