You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Elizabeth Weyel v. James Hopson, and American Bank of Texas, NA F/K/A State Bank & Trust of Seguin

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-14-00085-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; August 1, 2014; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

In the appellate case numbered 04-14-00085-CV, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas addressed an appeal involving Elizabeth Weyel as the Appellant, with James Hopson and American Bank of Texas, NA as Appellees. On August 1, 2014, the court issued an order indicating that, after thorough examination of the record and briefs, oral argument would not aid in resolving the appeal's legal and factual matters. This decision was made in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 39.8, leading to the denial of all requests for oral argument. The appeal is set to be submitted based solely on the briefs on September 10, 2014, before a panel of Justices Marion, Barnard, and Chapa. Parties will receive notifications of the court's decision in line with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48. Additionally, the order allows either party to file a motion to reconsider the dismissal of oral argument within ten days. Justice Sandee Marion signed the order, with the official date being August 1, 2014.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Oral Argument Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 39.8

Application: The court determined that oral argument would not provide further assistance in resolving the issues, thus denying requests for oral argument.

Reasoning: After reviewing the record and briefs, the Court concluded that oral argument would not be beneficial for resolving the legal and factual issues in the appeal, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 39.8.

Motion to Reconsider Denial of Oral Argument

Application: Parties have the opportunity to challenge the court's decision to deny oral argument within a specified timeframe.

Reasoning: Either party may file a motion to reconsider the decision to forgo oral argument within ten days of this order.

Notification of Court Decision

Application: The court ensures that parties will be informed of the decision per procedural rules, maintaining transparency and procedural fairness.

Reasoning: All parties will receive notification of the Court's decision per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.

Submission of Case Without Oral Argument

Application: The case is set to be submitted to a panel of justices solely based on the briefs, following the court's denial of oral argument.

Reasoning: The case is scheduled for submission based on the briefs on September 10, 2014, to a panel consisting of Justice Marion, Justice Barnard, and Justice Chapa.