You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Phillip Saenz and/or All Other Occupants v. U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for J.P. Morgan Acquisition Trust 2006-WMC4, Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-WMC4

Citation: Not availableDocket: 02-13-00221-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; March 20, 2014; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Court of Appeals for the Second District of Texas affirmed the judgment of the trial court regarding the case involving Phillip Saenz and/or all other occupants against U.S. Bank National Association, trustee for J.P. Morgan Acquisition Trust. The court found no errors in the trial court's judgment. Additionally, it ordered Saenz and/or all other occupants to pay all costs associated with the appeal, which will be covered by a cash deposit made in lieu of a bond with the trial court clerk. Any remaining funds from this deposit are to be refunded to Saenz and/or the other occupants. Justice Lee Gabriel authored the opinion.

Legal Issues Addressed

Affirmation of Lower Court Judgments

Application: The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision, indicating that no reversible errors were found in the proceedings or judgment of the lower court.

Reasoning: The Court of Appeals for the Second District of Texas affirmed the judgment of the trial court regarding the case involving Phillip Saenz and/or all other occupants against U.S. Bank National Association, trustee for J.P. Morgan Acquisition Trust.

Cost Assessment in Appeals

Application: The appellate court ordered that the costs of the appeal be paid by the appellant, utilizing a cash deposit made as a substitute for a bond.

Reasoning: Additionally, it ordered Saenz and/or all other occupants to pay all costs associated with the appeal, which will be covered by a cash deposit made in lieu of a bond with the trial court clerk.

Refund of Remaining Funds Post-Cost Payment

Application: Any remaining funds from the cash deposit, after the payment of appeal costs, are to be refunded to the appellant.

Reasoning: Any remaining funds from this deposit are to be refunded to Saenz and/or the other occupants.