Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Connie Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge, Richard Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge and Richard Rogge as Administrator of the Estate of Richard Hollas Rogge v. the City of Richmond, Texas, Todd Ganey and Danell Gaydos
Citation: Not availableDocket: 01-14-00866-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; December 22, 2014; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
Appellants Connie Rogge, Richard Rogge, and Richard Rogge as Administrator of the Estate of Richard Hollas Rogge filed a motion on December 23, 2014, requesting the Court of Appeals to order the Fort Bend District Clerk to supplement the clerk’s record with video evidence presented at trial. The Fort Bend District Clerk informed the Appellants that an order from the Court was necessary for this filing. The Court granted the motion, clarifying that an order is not required for a trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record when requested by a party. According to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5, trial court clerks are obligated to provide requested records and must comply without imposing additional requirements. The Fort Bend District Clerk is ordered to file the supplemental clerk’s record, including the requested exhibits, by January 5, 2015. The order was signed by Judge Michael Massengale on the same date.