Narrative Opinion Summary
Relators Paul D. Andrews, Keith M. Gould, The Gould Law Firm, and Andrews. Gould filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an accompanying emergency motion for stay on December 28, 2012. After thorough consideration, the Court determined that the relators did not demonstrate entitlement to the requested relief. Consequently, both the petition for writ of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay were denied. The decision was delivered and filed on December 28, 2012.
Legal Issues Addressed
Emergency Motion for Staysubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court considered the emergency motion for stay filed by the relators and decided to deny the motion.
Reasoning: Consequently, both the petition for writ of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay were denied.
Writ of Mandamussubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court evaluated the relators' petition for writ of mandamus but found it lacking in demonstrating the necessary entitlement to relief.
Reasoning: After thorough consideration, the Court determined that the relators did not demonstrate entitlement to the requested relief.