You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Tideport Distributing, Inc. v. Ramon Cerda, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brittany Cerda

Citation: Not availableDocket: 13-12-00493-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; March 20, 2014; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Tideport Distributing, Inc. appealed a judgment from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 10-2767-E. On January 29, 2014, the court granted Tideport's unopposed motion to abate the appeal pending a settlement agreement. Tideport subsequently filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, which the court granted after reviewing the relevant documents. The appeal is reinstated and dismissed with prejudice. Additionally, the court released Tideport's sureties, Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, from any obligations related to the supersedeas bonds. Costs will be taxed against the party incurring them, and no motion for rehearing will be considered. The mandate will issue immediately. The opinion was delivered on March 20, 2014.

Legal Issues Addressed

Abatement of Appeal Pending Settlement

Application: The court granted the appellant's motion to abate the appeal pending a settlement agreement, indicating that the appeal process can be paused while parties engage in settlement discussions.

Reasoning: On January 29, 2014, the court granted Tideport's unopposed motion to abate the appeal pending a settlement agreement.

Dismissal of Appeal With Prejudice

Application: The appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice was granted by the court, signifying the appeal cannot be refiled and the case is conclusively resolved.

Reasoning: Tideport subsequently filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, which the court granted after reviewing the relevant documents.

Immediate Issuance of Mandate

Application: The court ordered that the mandate be issued immediately, indicating the enforcement of the court's judgment without delay.

Reasoning: The mandate will issue immediately.

Release of Sureties from Supersedeas Bonds

Application: The court released the appellant's sureties from any obligations related to the supersedeas bonds, demonstrating that obligations of sureties can be nullified upon dismissal of the appeal.

Reasoning: Additionally, the court released Tideport's sureties, Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, from any obligations related to the supersedeas bonds.

Taxation of Costs Against Incurring Party

Application: The court ruled that costs incurred in the appeal will be borne by the party that incurred them, illustrating the principle of cost responsibility in judicial proceedings.

Reasoning: Costs will be taxed against the party incurring them, and no motion for rehearing will be considered.