You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Charles Lee v. State

Citation: Not availableDocket: 09-12-00440-CR

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; November 13, 2012; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Charles Lee was convicted of aggravated assault and subsequently sentenced by the trial court. He filed a notice of appeal; however, the trial court certified that this was a plea-bargain case, indicating that Lee had no right to appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). The court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless Lee provided valid grounds to continue the appeal. Lee submitted a response but failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d). The opinion was delivered by Justice David Gaultney on November 14, 2012, and the ruling is not intended for publication.

Legal Issues Addressed

Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Sufficient Grounds under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d)

Application: Charles Lee's appeal was dismissed because he failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for continuing the appeal after being notified by the court.

Reasoning: The court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless Lee provided valid grounds to continue the appeal. Lee submitted a response but failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds.

Right to Appeal in Plea-Bargain Cases under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2)

Application: The trial court determined that Charles Lee had no right to appeal his conviction because it was a plea-bargain case.

Reasoning: The trial court certified that this was a plea-bargain case, indicating that Lee had no right to appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2).