Narrative Opinion Summary
Michael Dowden's original mandamus petition was considered by the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Appellate District of Texas. The court, led by Justice Carter and including Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley, determined that Dowden is not entitled to the relief he sought. Consequently, the petition was denied. The judgment was rendered on January 2, 2014, and was officially documented by Chief Justice Josh R. Morriss, III, with Debra K. Autrey serving as the clerk.
Legal Issues Addressed
Judicial Decision Documentationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The judgment was formally documented with specific reference to the responsible judicial officials involved in the decision-making process.
Reasoning: The judgment was rendered on January 2, 2014, and was officially documented by Chief Justice Josh R. Morriss, III, with Debra K. Autrey serving as the clerk.
Mandamus Reliefsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court evaluated the petitioner's entitlement to mandamus relief and concluded that the petitioner did not meet the necessary criteria for such relief.
Reasoning: Michael Dowden's original mandamus petition was considered by the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Appellate District of Texas. The court, led by Justice Carter and including Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley, determined that Dowden is not entitled to the relief he sought.