You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

in Re: Teri Finnegan, Lee Chagra Jr. and Joanna Krancher

Citation: Not availableDocket: 08-14-00162-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; August 7, 2014; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Relators Terri Finnegan, Lee Chagra, Jr., and Joanna Krancher petitioned the Court of Appeals for a writ of mandamus against Judge Eduardo Gamboa of the Probate Court No. 2 of El Paso County, Texas. They sought to vacate a court order from April 16, 2014, which denied their motion to compel discovery. The Court denied the petition, stating that relators did not demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. To qualify for such relief, they needed to prove that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that there was no adequate remedy by appeal. The Court concluded that the relators failed to meet these requirements. The decision was rendered on August 7, 2014, by Justice Yvonne T. Rodriguez, with Justices McClure and Rivera on the panel.

Legal Issues Addressed

Court's Discretion in Discovery Orders

Application: The Court of Appeals denied the petition for a writ of mandamus, indicating that the relators failed to show that the Probate Court abused its discretion in denying the motion to compel discovery.

Reasoning: The Court denied the petition, stating that relators did not demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.

Mandamus Relief Requirements

Application: The relators needed to prove both a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court and the absence of an adequate remedy by appeal to qualify for mandamus relief.

Reasoning: To qualify for such relief, they needed to prove that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that there was no adequate remedy by appeal.