You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Betty Jane Gossett v. the Estate of Dona Lee Stovall, Deceased,and Lisa Jamieson as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Dona Lee Stovall

Citation: Not availableDocket: 10-14-00397-CV

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; March 19, 2015; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The Tenth Court of Appeals issued an order concerning mediation in the case involving an appeal by Betty Jane Gossett against The Estate of Dona Lee Stovall, Deceased. The court mandated mediation, requiring the parties to agree on a mediator and attend the session. However, David Lee Smith, who claimed not to be a party to the appeal, objected to the mediation order, citing travel burdens from Colorado to Texas. The court acknowledged the difficulty in determining party status due to unclear service details in the appellant’s docketing statement. It emphasized the necessity of stricter enforcement of service requirements and instructed all entities served with the mediation order to respond if they claim non-party status. Additionally, the appellant was ordered to amend its docketing statement within 14 days to accurately reflect service details for all involved parties, ensuring compliance with procedural rules. The court issued this directive on March 19, 2015, reinforcing the importance of clarity and compliance in procedural documentation.

Legal Issues Addressed

Amendment of Docketing Statements for Accuracy

Application: The appellant is required to amend its docketing statement to accurately reflect service details for all parties involved as stipulated by procedural rules.

Reasoning: The appellant must amend its docketing statement within 14 days to accurately reflect service details for all parties involved in the judgment under appeal, adhering to relevant procedural rules.

Mediation Requirement and Party Status

Application: The court mandated mediation and required parties to agree on a mediator and attend the session, while addressing objections concerning party status and logistical burdens.

Reasoning: The court mandated mediation on February 26, 2015, requiring parties to agree on a mediator and attend the mediation.

Objections to Mediation Orders Based on Non-Party Status

Application: The court addressed and sought resolution of objections from individuals claiming non-party status with respect to the mediation order.

Reasoning: David Lee Smith filed an objection, asserting he is not a party to the appeal and expressing concern about the travel burden to attend mediation in Texas from Colorado.

Procedural Requirements in Docketing Statements

Application: The court identified the need for stricter enforcement of service requirements within docketing statements to ensure clarity of party status.

Reasoning: The court noted the need for stricter enforcement of service requirements in docketing statements, as the current style of the case does not adequately identify all parties involved.