You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

John Doe I v. Unocal Corp.

Citation: Not availableDocket: 00-56603

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; April 12, 2005; Federal Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has granted a stipulated motion to dismiss four appeals (00-56603, 00-56628, 00-57195, and 00-57197) with prejudice, meaning the cases cannot be refiled. Each party will bear its own costs. Additionally, the court has granted the Appellants’ unopposed motion to vacate the district court's opinion in the case of Doe v. Unocal Corp., specifically the ruling reported at 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D. Cal. 2000), effectively nullifying that lower court decision. The ruling was made by a panel of Circuit Judges, including Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder and others.

Legal Issues Addressed

Allocation of Costs in Dismissed Appeals

Application: Each party is responsible for bearing its own costs following the dismissal of the appeals.

Reasoning: Each party will bear its own costs.

Dismissal of Appeals with Prejudice

Application: The court granted a stipulated motion to dismiss the appeals with prejudice, ensuring that the cases cannot be refiled.

Reasoning: The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has granted a stipulated motion to dismiss four appeals (00-56603, 00-56628, 00-57195, and 00-57197) with prejudice, meaning the cases cannot be refiled.

Vacatur of District Court Opinion

Application: The court granted the motion to vacate the district court's opinion, nullifying the decision in Doe v. Unocal Corp.

Reasoning: Additionally, the court has granted the Appellants’ unopposed motion to vacate the district court's opinion in the case of Doe v. Unocal Corp., specifically the ruling reported at 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D. Cal. 2000), effectively nullifying that lower court decision.