You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

in Re: Frizo Valero

Citation: Not availableDocket: 13-09-00366-CR

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; July 27, 2009; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Frizo Valero filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel Judge Elia Cornejo Lopez of the 404th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, to vacate an order dated January 28, 2009. This order pertained to the State’s motion for reconsideration that aimed to void previous modifications to Valero's probation judgment and to dismiss related charges. After thorough consideration of the petition and the State's response, the Court of Appeals, comprised of Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela, concluded that Valero was not entitled to the requested relief. Consequently, the petition for the writ of mandamus was denied. The memorandum opinion was filed on July 27, 2009, and is not intended for publication.

Legal Issues Addressed

Mandamus Relief Criteria

Application: The Court of Appeals determined that Frizo Valero did not meet the criteria necessary for mandamus relief, as his petition to vacate the order was denied.

Reasoning: After thorough consideration of the petition and the State's response, the Court of Appeals, comprised of Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela, concluded that Valero was not entitled to the requested relief.

Non-Publication of Judicial Opinions

Application: The memorandum opinion in this case was not intended for publication, indicating the Court's decision to limit its precedential value.

Reasoning: The memorandum opinion was filed on July 27, 2009, and is not intended for publication.