You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Franciso Saucedo v. State

Citation: Not availableDocket: 12-08-00026-CR

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; January 22, 2008; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Francisco Saucedo, the Appellant, pleaded guilty to aggravated assault against a public servant in six separate cases, classified as first-degree felonies. Sentencing for all cases took place on December 11, 2006. The trial court provided certification indicating that the Appellant waived his right to appeal in each case, as per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d). Consequently, the appeals were dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. This opinion was delivered on January 23, 2008, by a panel consisting of Chief Justice Worthen, Justice Griffith, and Justice Hoyle. The decision is marked as not for publication.

Legal Issues Addressed

Jurisdictional Dismissal of Appeals

Application: The appeals were dismissed because the Appellant's waiver of the right to appeal led to a lack of jurisdiction.

Reasoning: Consequently, the appeals were dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction.

Non-Publication of Judicial Opinions

Application: The decision in this case was not intended for publication, indicating it may not be used as precedent.

Reasoning: The decision is marked as not for publication.

Waiver of Right to Appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d)

Application: The Appellant waived his right to appeal in each case, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals due to lack of jurisdiction.

Reasoning: The trial court provided certification indicating that the Appellant waived his right to appeal in each case, as per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d).