Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
in Re D&P Holdings, Inc. D/B/A Diversified Insurance Facilities, John F. Armstrong and G. Edward Goodwin
Citation: Not availableDocket: 09-09-00223-CV
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; June 11, 2009; Texas; State Appellate Court
Original Court Document: View Document
D&P Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Diversified Insurance Facilities, along with John F. Armstrong and G. Edward Goodwin, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, asserting that the trial court acted with an abuse of discretion by disqualifying their counsel. The court clarified that mandamus relief is appropriate only in cases of clear abuse of discretion that cannot be rectified through an appeal. After reviewing the relevant records and petition, the court found no evidence supporting the relators' claim of abuse of discretion by the trial court. Consequently, the stay order issued on May 22, 2009, was lifted, and the petition for writ of mandamus was denied. The opinion was delivered on June 11, 2009, by a panel including Chief Justice McKeithen and Justices Kreger and Horton.