You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Vincent Dale Ross v. State

Citation: Not availableDocket: 04-07-00374-CR

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas; July 3, 2007; Texas; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Vincent Dale Ross, the appellant, filed a motion to dismiss his appeal against the State of Texas. The motion was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. This decision was made in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). The ruling was issued by a per curiam opinion and filed on July 3, 2007, by the Justices Speedlin, Simmons, and Hilbig of the Court. The memorandum opinion is designated as not for publication.

Legal Issues Addressed

Application of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a)

Application: The appeal was dismissed in accordance with the procedural rule that allows for voluntary dismissal by the appellant.

Reasoning: This decision was made in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a).

Dismissal of Appeal by Motion

Application: The appellant filed a motion to dismiss his own appeal, which was granted by the court.

Reasoning: Vincent Dale Ross, the appellant, filed a motion to dismiss his appeal against the State of Texas. The motion was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.

Issuance of Per Curiam Opinion

Application: The dismissal decision was issued by a per curiam opinion, reflecting the unanimous decision of the panel of justices.

Reasoning: The ruling was issued by a per curiam opinion and filed on July 3, 2007, by the Justices Speedlin, Simmons, and Hilbig of the Court.

Non-Publication of Memorandum Opinion

Application: The court designated the memorandum opinion as not for publication, indicating it is not intended to be used as precedent.

Reasoning: The memorandum opinion is designated as not for publication.